Idaho Security Guard Licensure Practice Exam

In which scenario is a security guard typically allowed to detain someone?

1. When they have a personal dislike for the individual

2. When they have reasonable evidence of wrongdoing

3. When they suspect someone is trespassing

4. When they want to verify someone's identity

The correct answer is: When they have reasonable evidence of wrongdoing

A security guard is permitted to detain someone when they possess reasonable evidence of wrongdoing. This is important because the authority to detain is generally rooted in the need to prevent harm or protect property. Reasonable evidence suggests that the guard has observed behavior or circumstances that indicate a violation of the law or company policy has likely occurred. This standard is critical, as it helps to ensure that detainment is justified and not arbitrary. By requiring reasonable evidence, the law aims to protect individuals from undue restraint while balancing the security needs of the property or individuals they are tasked with protecting. In contrast, detaining someone based solely on personal feelings or dislike would not have a legitimate basis and could violate an individual's rights. Similarly, while suspicion of trespassing could warrant inquiry or investigation, it does not always meet the threshold of having evidence of wrongdoing. Lastly, wanting to verify someone's identity may not justify detainment unless there is an underlying concern or evidence of misconduct associated with that individual. Thus, without reasonable evidence of wrongdoing, any action taken could be challenged legally.